What are the Government’s real intentions on Protocol?
Brexit

What are the Government’s real intentions on Protocol?

Article published in today’s News Letter

Analysis by TUV leader Jim Allister:-

“Unionists lulled into thinking that HMG with its Protocol Bill is determined to right the wrongs of treating GB as a foreign country within NI’s trade and subjecting us to foreign laws we don’t make and can’t change, should remain alert to what is actually happening on the Protocol front.

“These three facts are as informative as they are concerning:-

HMG is pinning hopes on fresh negotiations with an EU which doggedly refuses to change its negotiating mandate from mere better implementation of the Protocol, while resolutely refusing to renegotiate its fundamentals. Thus these negotiations are incapable of producing an outcome acceptable to Unionism as they, under these terms, can not recover the EU’s ill-gotten sovereignty over Northern Ireland. The Secretary of State’s contribution in yesterday’s News Letter gave little comfort that this is a government really seized of the imperative of the restoration of U.K. sovereignty – even his misguided priority of the return of unworkable devolution rather than remedying this fundamental sovereignty issue is concerning.
Simultaneously with the Government progressing its Protocol Bill it has introduced into Parliament the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill which provides for the removal of EU laws in GB, but not in NI. Clause 1(5) is clear in excluding NI from the reach and effect of the Bill, leaving us to continue subject to EU laws, with 361 EU ‘legal acts’ adopted so far this year (to 5/9) which apply in NI under the Protocol. Why is HMG passing legislation to liberate the U.K. from EU law but excluding NI, if it really intends to deliver us from the iniquitous Protocol?
Earlier this month, in a highly significant development, HMG argued in the Belfast High Court (in a JR challenge to Minister Poots belatedly directing an end to internal U.K. customs checks) that the relevant law (Regulation 2017/625) should be interpreted on the basis that, contrary to Art 6 of the Acts of Union, the United Kingdom is no longer in terms of trade a unitary state and that NI, consistent with the Protocol, should be regarded as not included in U.K. territory when it comes to trade. This is an astounding submission which, while it confirms everything I and others have said about the Union-dismantling nature of the Protocol, also illustrates a Government complicit in implementing the very Protocol they would have us believe they oppose!

Every Unionist, therefore should remain alert to political manoeuvrings and games which are going on in respect of the Protocol, not least in our courts. At the end of November we will again see HMG’s disingenuous postering exposed when in our Supreme Court it deploys arguments to actually prop up the Protocol and resist the unionist challenge that it breaches our very Acts of Union.

So, now is very much a time to stay focussed and strong on the core sovereignty and constitutional issues at stake and to withstand all blandishments – including those from the Secretary of State – to give up the Stormont leverage which is what to date has produced any movement from the Government.